Just some years back, searching for case precedent was a tough and time consuming task, requiring folks to search through print copies of case regulation, or to buy access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a host of case law search opportunities, and many sources offer free access to case legislation.
Online access to civil and criminal cases in decide on circuit courts. Cases may very well be searched by locality using name, case number, or hearing date.
As a society, it truly is essential to continue striving to get a just legal system that assures fairness, protection, and respect for all individuals’ right to life.
maintaining the conviction awarded for the appellant reduce the sentence with the appellant from imprisonment for life to one already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)
These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Allow the decision stand"—will be the principle by which judges are bound to this sort of past decisions, drawing on established judicial authority to formulate their positions.
In this blog post, we will delve into the details of Section 302 PPC, exploring its provisions plus the gravity of its punishment.
Let’s deal with what the Prosecution must prove in order to gain a conviction. There are four elements that must be proven.
The court cannot listen to the transfer order challenge because it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders keeping in view that one of several respondents has retired from service as pointed out via the counsel for that respondent university. 12. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order as to costs. Read more
department concerned shall offer the complete list of ACRs on the concerned officer to DPC well in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)
acquitted the appellants from every one of the charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. (Criminal Revision )
In the event the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only completed In the event the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence as well as petitioner company responded on the allegations therefore they were perfectly conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to become appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
ten. Without touching the merits from the case with the issue of once-a-year increases during the pensionary emoluments with the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of your provincial government, this sort of yearly increase, if permissible within the case of employees of KMC, calls for further assessment being made via the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance on account of funding issues and deficiency of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a chance to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only finished If your employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and also the petitioner company responded into the allegations as a result they were effectively aware of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
fourteen. From the light of your position explained earlier mentioned, it can be concluded that a civil servant has a fundamental right to be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be viewed as for no fault of his individual and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency in the length of service or within the form of inquiry and departmental action click here was so taken against his right of promotion. Read more